Last modified: 2004-07-31 by juan manuel gabino villascán
Keywords: mexico | aztec | mexica | tacuba | tlacopan | texcoco | labaro | cortés | nahuatl | amate | paper | pantli |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
See:
See also:
Nahuatl speaker use a symbolic (non-phonetic) "alphabet".
The glyph in question was used to represent
the city on written document but in the same way then writing
down: "L-O-N-D-O-N".
Marc Pasquin, December 22, 2002.
Thank you Mr. Pasquin for clarifying this very important point.
In other words, such glyphs used on pantlith, which were made of "amate"
(from the nahuatl word "amatl", a tree ficus grabata of whose bark
Mesoamerican peoples made a sort of yellowish paper named after it),
should be understood something like "texts on flags". However, because such
"pantlitl" were put at the entrance of the towns or cities, they could be
also "signs" like those placed on roads.
For example:
By the way, because of the material (amate) the flags (pantlitl) were built, there is not physical or existent evidence of them. The main, and may be the only, sources about the matter are the pre-Hispanic and colonial chronicles and codex.
Juan Manuel Gabino Villascán, December 25, 2002.
Mexico-Tenochtitlan was administrativelly divided into 20 calpullis,
four of them were the most important ones and the political centers.
Each had its own ensign, dressing, and organization.
The four main calpullis weres: Cuepopan, Moyotla, Soquiapan, and Atzacualco.
Out of these 20 calpullis, there is just pictogrphic testimony of the four
main calpullis, accoding the Mendocine Codex
Juan Manuel Gabino Villascán, May 1, 2002